Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:07:32 -0500
Message-Id: <199903161907.OAA20168@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <199903151815.NAA06375@mccoy2.ECE.McGill.CA> (message from Alain
	Magloire on Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:15:42 -0500 (EST))
Subject: Re: diffs for socket error codes and messages
References:  <199903151815 DOT NAA06375 AT mccoy2 DOT ECE DOT McGill DOT CA>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> I tend to agree with you to keep most of libsocket separated
> but it would probably make it easier for Richard D. to have some
> hooks in the C lib.

I agree this would be good, but the question is: do the values used by
libsocket match the ones defined by POSIX?  If not, we're wasting
time, and should be fixing libsocket (et al) to match POSIX before we
put the POSIX values in djgpp.