X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=134efHLibUkWk6MvNiWJYaJ+CpZ8rtLhCjtdIyKKIgA=; b=SVlFnLbDwfMCFMwc5cqGGulggwvzwxHm97LZAcTkPHkoOmqOMqr5l1PE4pFv28QMuZ PWCMsdRM1aX8+hKY1vusOKMY/lqgs0f/nh9aQcxcz1l+uyRZYYlwnIWv7PW0S5AOYlFg 2cROl4qRFoVx2Hb1umYKZXxyEU9i5Bii/Vjb4IobNrKYm2FeO8SGgbJK0OCoeSmj//3p oyBT+tdyCLPjLCNoPlNEaVltek2hx33tw64REYfGD8cz2E+kKngkzxXKbxe1C0xFmaOK lyKhBt+yn4jtsik/L/2K1wZK6ZUQbyrravbRc9MPOQ92wA3Fa6znJGcTtq4KtCaWIbsZ MEAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.153.33 with SMTP id vd1mr4909obb.86.1398115035685; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:17:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53555BFD.4000202@gmx.de> References: <53555BFD DOT 4000202 AT gmx DOT de> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:17:15 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ctime.c changes add about 4.5k more size From: Rugxulo To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Hi, On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Juan Manuel Guerrero wrote: > Am 21.04.2014 08:44, schrieb Ozkan Sezer: > >> Recent(ish) src/libc/ansi/time/ctime.c changes add about 4.5k more >> size to the final stripped binary: >> >> #include >> int main () { >> return time(NULL); >> } >> >> Linking against v2.04 from 2011-10-01 gives a 91648 bytes a.exe, >> whereas linking against v2.04 from 2014-04-20 gives a 96256 bytes >> a.exe. (not mentioning at all the crazy sizes themselves which is >> irrelevant to the present case at hand.) A "return 0" instead of >> a "return time(NULL)" yields a 52736 bytes exe, so ctime.c stuff >> is adding about 43k size. >> >> time() calls gettimeofday() which calls 0x2c and 0x2a dos functions >> and calls ctime.c::mktime() where the additional bloat happens. >> >> Is there no other way of reducing the code size here? Not automatically since COFF (nor PE/COFF) doesn't have proper support for --gc-sections in GNU ld, last I heard. > The time zone database format has changed so that the original ctime code > of djgpp (code before 2011-10-01) had to be replaced (aka ported) by the > ctime code provided by time zone source code. > > If someone can optimize the ctime code for speed and size, that changes will > always be welcome; but I do not think that optimization for size should be > done sacrificing/removing time zone features that other users expect to be > provided by djgpp. BTW, on a semi-related note, a few years ago I mentioned that mkdir() was always pulling in ctime.o , so that will also make some apps even bigger in size. The culprit (for that separate case) is apparently xstat.c's _file_time_stamp(), which should probably be split into a separate file entirely (ftstamp.c ?). http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2009/09/26/21:32:54 http://www.delorie.com/bin/cvsweb.cgi/djgpp/src/libc/posix/sys/stat/xstat.c