X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <5018154E.1070408@iki.fi> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:26:38 +0300 From: Andris Pavenis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: gcc-4.8 snapshots and DJGPP References: <50152C66 DOT 9040202 AT iki DOT fi> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com On 07/31/2012 03:54 PM, Rugxulo wrote: >> I think that one of suspects is nmalloc used instead of DJGPP own memory >> allocation (as DJGPP free() is too slow). I had some stability problems >> earlier running my own test program (linked with nmalloc) which allocates >> large numbers of random memory blocks and after that frees them in random >> order. That memory allocation test program caused random NTVDM crashes >> on Windows Vista. > > It could be nmalloc's bug, who knows, but I don't trust Vista as far > as I can throw it re: DPMI. I would not put it past them as their bug, > even with the DPMI limit override. Seriously. Try testing in pure DOS, > if possible, and see if it's still buggy. Maybe. Similar problems does not happen using DJGPP own memory allocation as far as I remember. Well I do not have any pure DOS installation. Also Windows 7 Pro 64 bit version is not suitable (maybe it is still possible to try WinXP compatibility mode, really WinXP virtual machine provided by M$) > >> Not much testing done with built GCC snapshot though. Built GMP-5.0.5, but >> one of >> test-suite programs (mpz/t-io_raw.exe) failed. I did not have time >> to study why it fails yet. > > Needs setmode(O_BINARY) ??? > Highly unlikely as it build and tests runs OK when built with released GCC versions I have tested. Andris