DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=wltqU8KmIP6PO/6lRCsf8Uc0yu1erGRhIHcOqST9g2mgsjC0LVbF2WsVOApQcNMxfT
         4ASHAt8dNcP1ECLgIQt9a36wteXcyPbPKgMjvVyxikYuhz25mN+WISjOXPGd3NjcMx0E
         1UDssnneMDWoDvuNV8DBg1odv2g1Khp0qlI6c=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4DBD4955.3060104@iki.fi>
References: <4DBD4955 DOT 3060104 AT iki DOT fi>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 15:12:26 +0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTinjVbzzxZ=1ZNyXAJjrJboaodcCtw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: djgpp*.djl
From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Andris Pavenis <andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi> wrote:
> Last GCC version which required djgpp*.djl was ancient 3.4.X and
> corresponding file djgpp-x.djl was provided then already for some
> time.
>

I for one still am using gcc-3.3.6 or 3.4.6 for my djgpp compilation needs...

> Is it OK to remove all references to djgpp.djl and djgpp-x.djl
> from djgpp/src/makefile.inc and corresponding file in djgpp/tests?
>
> File in djgpp/lib may still stay (or it also could be removed)
>
> Andris
>
>

--
Ozkan