X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f From: Message-Id: <200501010100.j0110Pn3018964@speedy.ludd.ltu.se> Subject: Re: restrict keyword In-Reply-To: "from Brian Inglis at Dec 31, 2004 12:37:23 pm" To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 02:00:25 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-ltu-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ltu-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Happy New Year! According to Brian Inglis: > On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:51:11 +0100 (CET), ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se wrote: > > >+#if __GNUC__ < 3 /* || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 1)*/ > >+#define restrict > >+#endif > > We really don't want to do this as it could mess up the user's space. ... > I'd suggest one or more underscores _restrict or _RESTRICT_ or > __restrict__. Ok. So I replace all restrict with __restrict__ and change the version entry to +#if __GNUC__ < 3 || __GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < what!!!! #define __restrict__ else #define __restrict__ restrict #endif ? Happy New Year Miss Sophie! Right, MartinS