X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:51:47 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <01c4e928$Blat.v2.2.2$fb5f31a0@zahav.net.il>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2
In-reply-to: <kgmks05q8sjh250gp7es1mfmru16c3c6kf@4ax.com> (message from Brian
	Inglis on Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:42:41 -0700)
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU gzip-1.3.5 uploaded
References: <1103476827 DOT 41c5b85b491aa AT webmail DOT wilkes DOT edu>
 <200412191748 DOT iBJHmmaM005825 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <01c4e604$Blat.v2.2.2$63db7180 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
 <38obs0ddbi3hjj9rj1753em0fi7qcm20or AT 4ax DOT com>
 <01c4e718$Blat.v2.2.2$633278e0 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
 <200412211534 DOT iBLFYXii019390 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <01c4e797$Blat.v2.2.2$6714a260 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
 <bbvhs05qaa8gghciljptu89vojtvkk2i47 AT 4ax DOT com>
 <01c4e854$Blat.v2.2.2$09be9b80 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
 <kgmks05q8sjh250gp7es1mfmru16c3c6kf AT 4ax DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:42:41 -0700
> From: Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
> 
> >  if (spawnlp (P_WAIT, STUBIFY, STUBIFY, "-g", dest_abs, (char *)0)
> >      || spawnlp (P_WAIT, STUBEDIT, STUBEDIT, dest_abs, ropt, (char *)0))
> >    return -1;
> >
> >Should we create a v2.04 style symlink if stubify and/or stubedit
> >failed in this fragment?  I don't know.
> 
> I guess some research into the failure modes and return codes of
> stubify and stubedit are in order. 

Indeed.

> The intermingling of 2.03 and 2.04 symlinks is looking more
> interesting (as in the Chinese curse!) 

Happy hacking!