X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:08:29 +0200 (EET)
From: Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Sender: peuha AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Broken sscanf test case
In-Reply-To: <404E8953.9FD6E7EE@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.58.0403101102400.26067@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
References: <200403091940 DOT i29Je9Vl028408 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
 <200403092104 DOT i29L4QQB005462 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <404E8953 DOT 9FD6E7EE AT yahoo DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, CBFalconer wrote:

> DJ Delorie wrote:

> > Our opinions on interpreting the standard are much less
> > significant than theirs, and I would rather trust them to
> > interpret the standard correctly than our own judgement.  We
> > already got the strtoul one wrong.
>
> We did?  I thought it was resolved that DJGPP strtoul was standard
> compliant, after I started that particular flap, both here and on
> c.l.c and c.s.c.

That's exactly the point: we thought (wrongly) it was incorrect based on
our own interpretation of the standard.

-- 
Esa Peuha
student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki
http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/