X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3F9ED98B.75295116@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:03:07 +0000
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: New plan for 2.04
References: <3F9980BB DOT 9F366A48 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0310281115580 DOT 32687 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Esa A E Peuha wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Richard Dawe wrote:
> 
> > Let's set a vague target of sometime in November for DJGPP 2.04 beta.
> > Maybe we should have a CVS check-in freeze in mid-November. Let's decide
> > a date nearer the time.
> 
> I think that the libc part of my stack overflow checking code should be
> in 2.04 (I'd rather have it in libc before trying to get gcc support it).
> ISTR there were no objections to the code I mailed here last February,
> so I'll check it into CVS in a few days.

There was quite a lot of discussion. You didn't actually post a patch against
CVS. Could post a patch against CVS, so that we can review it, please?

I'm not going to get round to releasing DJGPP 2.04 beta until November, so
there's plenty of time for it to go in. ;)

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

"You can't evaluate a man by logic alone." -- McCoy, "I, Mudd", Star Trek