Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:01:13 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Message-Id: <7458-Mon11Aug2003190113+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <10308111336.AA16307@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject: Re: inode problem in `rm'
References:  <10308111336 DOT AA16307 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:36:32 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> Since our inodes are not very reliable, and the security issues under
> a DJGPP port are not as big an issue, I believe we should remove this
> code from the DJGPP ports.

I'd suggest to try debugging this before giving up, we do want our
`stat' to produce reliable inodes on all supported platforms.