Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:01:13 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu Message-Id: <7458-Mon11Aug2003190113+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <10308111336.AA16307@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu) Subject: Re: inode problem in `rm' References: <10308111336 DOT AA16307 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann) > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:36:32 -0500 (CDT) > > Since our inodes are not very reliable, and the security issues under > a DJGPP port are not as big an issue, I believe we should remove this > code from the DJGPP ports. I'd suggest to try debugging this before giving up, we do want our `stat' to produce reliable inodes on all supported platforms.