From: Message-Id: <200306291430.h5TEU6x5002685@speedy.ludd.luth.se> Subject: Re: djgpp: djgpp/include/libc/ieee.h In-Reply-To: <200306291423.h5TENRX26465@delorie.com> "from cvs-richdawe@delorie.com at Jun 29, 2003 10:23:27 am" To: DJGPP-WORKERS Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 16:30:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk According to cvs-richdawe AT delorie DOT com: > RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/include/libc/ieee.h,v > retrieving revision 1.2 > retrieving revision 1.3 > diff -p -2 -r1.2 -r1.3 > *** djgpp/include/libc/ieee.h 4 Feb 2003 20:25:05 -0000 1.2 > --- djgpp/include/libc/ieee.h 29 Jun 2003 14:23:25 -0000 1.3 > *************** typedef struct { > *** 39,42 **** > --- 39,61 ---- > } long_double_t; > > + > + typedef union > + { > + double d; > + double_t dt; > + } _double_union_t; > + > + typedef union > + { > + long double ld; > + long_double_t ldt; > + } longdouble_union_t; What happened to "staying out of application name space"? Underscore, someone? Did you really have the latest patch? Right, MartinS