From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200306231807.h5NI7w5U011127@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: fpclassify
In-Reply-To: <3EF6009F.2EB2DD7F@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> "from Richard Dawe at
 Jun 22, 2003 08:16:47 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 20:07:58 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Richard Dawe:
> Where did the name sys/math_def.h come from? Is it a library-internal header

It's 8.3 for math_defines.h or math_definitions.h.

> file? If so, wouldn't it be better as <libc/math_def.h>? Personally I'd also

No. Its contents should be in <math.h>, but because of prototypes .S
files won't compile when #including <math.h> so I had to break out the
constants needed into a new file.

All #defines should probably be moved to that one for consistency
(IMHO) but I'm not sure everyone would like that.

> prefer the name mathdefs.h, since there's more than one definition.

I'm open for changes. What do the other developers think?


Right,

						MartinS