Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:09:00 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <2427-Wed11Jun2003180859+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3EE6B922.484CA74C@yahoo.com> (message from CBFalconer on Wed, 11
	Jun 2003 01:07:46 -0400)
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 alpha 2 later in the month?
References: <3EE4EB66 DOT DF7891D2 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3EE4F833 DOT 2B67D8C0 AT yahoo DOT com> <3EE582BB DOT DEC034FA AT yahoo DOT com> <3EE62BC7 DOT F14013F8 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3EE65932 DOT C87DFF4B AT yahoo DOT com> <7458-Wed11Jun2003054647+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3EE6B922 DOT 484CA74C AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 01:07:46 -0400
> From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
> > 
> > You should use gcc.opt from the CVS, it should already solve these
> > warnings.
> 
> I just changed the options here.

If you changed them to the exact list of options in the CVS version of
gcc.opt, fine.  If not, please do that if you can, since otherwise
those options you did not use in your compilations could cause further
warnings when Richard integrates your sources into the library.  You
have a better understanding of your code, so it's better if you are
the first person to see the warnings and deal with them.

Thanks.