From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10302142005.AA22053@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: djasm in djasm?
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:05:26 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <200302141822.h1EIMO102255@speedy.ludd.luth.se> from "ams@ludd.luth.se" at Feb 14, 2003 07:22:24 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> There was at least one request for moving djasm to it's own
> directory. I'm in favour.
> 
> I've moved stub/djasm* to djasm/ ("mkdir djasm; mv stub/djasm* djasm")
> and have a successful compilation.

This seems reasonable to me also - as long as it all works.  The 
includes for the utils documentation need to be fixed too.   

> As a bonus we can stop relaxing warnings for stub/, which will give us
> at least one new warning for the files left there.

Sounds like a good thing.