From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200302141848.h1EImxR02368@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: djasm in djasm?
In-Reply-To: <200302141822.h1EIMO102255@speedy.ludd.luth.se> "from ams@ludd.luth.se
 at Feb 14, 2003 07:22:24 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:48:59 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se:
> As a bonus we can stop relaxing warnings for stub/, which will give us
> at least one new warning for the files left there.

Actually the warnings are so many that it looks like relaxing the
warnings isn't an option even if we do move djasm.y.

Warnings seen before giving up: "shadows global declaration", "cast
does not match function prototype" and "no previous prototype". (That
last one is braindead as that is at the definition of local
functions.)


Right,

						MartinS