From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10212111759.AA24198@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 status page updates: more to-dos, priorities
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:59:20 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <3DF771E2.B13735DA@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> from "Richard Dawe" at Dec 11, 2002 05:12:02 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

>     http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/djgpp/2.04/status204.html

Thanks, looks good.  Under incompatibilities section, might mention
new symlink format (V2.03 won't understand them).  But I still don't think
this will be a big deal since nothing else outside the DJGPP toolchain
will understand them either.

> Charles: I'm not sure what you meant when you wrote 'priority 5'. I've
> assigned the items priority 4, which you marked as priority 5. These are
> feature requests / low priority - I think that's what you meant.

Good guess, sorry for the confusion.