Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:28:23 -0500
Message-Id: <200211111528.gABFSNh13357@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
CC: kai DOT ruottu AT luukku DOT com, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org,
   crossgcc AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
In-reply-to: <00af01c28994$cd6293f0$021ca8c0@helm> (message from 2boxers on
	Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:12:51 -0500)
Subject: Re: cross-gcc build for a linux host for the msdosdjgpp target problems
References: <3DCFCF6B DOT 25752 DOT 31A4FAE AT localhost> <00af01c28994$cd6293f0$021ca8c0 AT helm>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> The only thing that hinted me into thinking that there was some significance
> to using newlib vs glibc, was the fact that the libstdc++ configure script
> was including newlib headers from ~/libstdc++-v3/config/os/newlib instead
> djgpp headers from ~/libstdc++-v3/config/os/djgpp

That would be a bug.