From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann) Message-Id: <10206101923.AA18712@clio.rice.edu> Subject: Re: uclock() on Win2K To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 14:23:18 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <14ABCA59.4AC487CF.0E256317@netscape.net> from "Alexander Aganichev" at Jun 10, 2002 07:20:14 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > I recall that I've already had a problem with that and part of the > problem was that uclock() does not check status from RTC. Can you please > look on bug 000245 (http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/bugs/show.cgi?000245)? > As far as I remember, I had very stable results under Win95. I can't > speek about Windows NT and it's clones since at that time I had no > access to them and now I'm not intrested in the uclock() at all. Thanks. I'll try it and see if it improves anything.