X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:17:28 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Message-Id: <4098-Sun28Apr2002181727+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, zippo-workers AT yahoogroups DOT com
In-reply-to: <3CCBD167.3AAD0FF1@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Sun, 28 Apr 2002 11:39:35 +0100)
Subject: Re: Naming packages in DSMs
References:  <3CCBD167 DOT 3AAD0FF1 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 11:39:35 +0100
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> Personally I think that packages should all be named in lowercase, because
> having more than one case in package names is confusing for users. But more
> importantly the DSMs should agree what names to use for packages.
> 
> What does everyone think?

I think zippo should match packages case-insensitively.  No matter how
hard do we try to lower-case the names, errors are always possible,
especially with fast typists using the Emacs M-/ wonder ;-) OTOH, I
don't see any reason why we should insist on a specific case.  So I
think zippo had better not be too stringent about that.