X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-ID: <3CC46C84.2179D14B@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 21:03:16 +0100 From: Richard Dawe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Malloc/free DJGPP code References: <10204220408 DOT AA16715 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Hello. Charles Sandmann wrote: > > CBFalconer wrote: > > I put a whole bunch (of benchmarks) up earlier using a/b > > comparisons on my machine with some of my software. I am > > impressed by the apparent NIH syndrome, and am not especially > > motivated to contribute further efforts. This is the first time > > anyone has shown any signs of even reading the code > > Please be patient. At least in my case, this isn't a NIH syndrome > (I'm quite happy replacing anything I've ever written, even actively > suggest it ...) but a case of time. OK, what does NIH mean? > If you check the DJGPP workers discussions, you will find some dicussions > on less significant parts of the libc have gone on for months before > getting finalized. One example is snprintf, vsnprintf. They took about a year to get into CVS, I think. Bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]