X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f X-Authentication-Warning: new-smtp2.ihug.com.au: Host p198-tnt7.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.144.198] claimed to be acceleron Message-ID: <002901c1db57$fbb782b0$0102a8c0@acceleron> From: "Andrew Cottrell" To: , Cc: "Charles Sandmann" References: Subject: Re: Sh-utils 2.0.11 sources Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 07:38:34 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Preshant, I am in the process of rebuilding all of the 2.04 files available at clio and including updates such as the Shell Utils alpha release. I have built the shell utils 2.0.11 and the dirname has a problem where it displays garbage or is there some undocumented feature where this is the time and priveleges of the directory?. Below are the results from dirname from the 2.0j and the 2.01 builds. The reason for finding this was that this caused GCC 3.04 build to fail. I am about to go to work and thought I should send this off. I will try to find out what is causing this tonight if it is still open. DJGPP_204 D:\dj204\gnu>dir dirname.exe /s Directory of D:\dj204\gnu\old\sh-util2.0j\src 03/02/2002 09:46 PM 142,220 dirname.exe Directory of D:\dj204\gnu\sh-util2.01\src 03/04/2002 08:23 AM 147,784 dirname.exe DJGPP_204 D:\dj204\gnu>old\sh-util2.0j\src\dirname old . DJGPP_204 D:\dj204\gnu>sh-util2.01\src\dirname old old ? ?s Ht DJGP? Regards, Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Prashant TR" To: Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 5:36 PM Subject: Sh-utils 2.0.11 sources > Hi All, > > The sources for the DJGPP port of sh-utils 2.0.11 are on > > ftp://ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/gnu/djgpp/v2gnu/alphas/shl2011s.zip > > There have been a lot of changes w.r.t. the configure stuff. They are > a lot more cleaner (or it seems to me that way ;) ). Apart from that > some minor changes to the source patches. > > I haven't tried building the postscript and dvi files since I don't > have the the DJGPP port of tex downloaded. I'd appreciate if someone > could check if this works fine. > > Thanks, > Prashant >