Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:23:31 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: Martin Str|mberg Message-Id: <2427-Tue19Jun2001222331+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <200106191900.VAA18430@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin Str|mberg on Tue, 19 Jun 2001 21:00:10 +0200 (MET DST)) Subject: Re: size_t and ssize_t References: <200106191900 DOT VAA18430 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: Martin Str|mberg > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 21:00:10 +0200 (MET DST) > > Any particular reason for not having "#define __DJ_ssize_t > typedef long int ssize_t"? Or even "long signed int ssize_t"? Why, what difference will that make?