Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:29:04 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Michel de Ruiter <Michel AT smr DOT nl>
cc: "'djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com'" <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>,
        Juan Manuel Guerrero <ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De>
Subject: RE: 2 suggestions for djtar
In-Reply-To: <B0FEA00E82A7D1118BFB00A0CC9902784633C5@argon.smr.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010319152849.24078A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Michel de Ruiter wrote:

> > Btw, does anyone know whether 4DOS groks Unix style EOLs in its *.btm
> > files?  If not, they should be converted as well.
> 
> 4NT 3.02B *does* grok LF-only EOFs. I think 4DOS and 4NT have done it
> for many years at least, so they do not have to be converted. It cannot
> think of a situation where it hurts, though...
> 
> Hope this helps,

Yes, it helps.  Thanks.