Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:02:22 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
cc: Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: RE: Patch for src/mkdoc/makefile
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.05.10103191000110.82590-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010319130107.23067B@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> I didn't saw definition of GXX in current makefiles. However adding it 
> would perhaps be better than explicit adding of -lstdcxx to makefile in
> src/mkdoc/makefile as that could break building djlsrXXX with
> cross-compiler as the name of C++ library could also be libstdc++ 

An alternative is to use $(GCC), but get the name of libstdc++ from the 
compiler itself, like we do with libgcc.a.