Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:31:41 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: zero fill the eof gap 2.1
In-Reply-To: <3AB4C9B5.25069.91E3E5@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010319092840.21558F-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Mark E. wrote:

> > Maybe a better option would be to leave _DEV_CDEV out of this, and
> > instead provide a means to enable and disable the zero-fill on a
> > by-handle basis?
> 
> I think that's a good idea. I made changes to do just that.

Thanks; I'm happy now ;-)