From: Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id: <200101311027.LAA06798@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: Binary rubbish
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:27:43 +0100 (MET)
In-Reply-To: <20010131100400.12798.qmail@lauras.lt> from "Laurynas Biveinis" at Jan 31, 2001 12:04:00 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> But that ``binary rubish'' is a standard way to attach files
> to emails. Maybe there is a newer ELM version than that one
> you're using?

I don't know, however if it existed it wouldn't be any good: I
obviously want to comment on some of the text; why should I need to
cut and paste from that other window/whatever? If the original poster
put it in the message body, I'd have all the text at my hands to edit
as I see fit.

If people want feedback, they should make it easy to provide it.


Right,

						MartinS