Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 20:43:01 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se Message-Id: <9743-Sun07Jan2001204301+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <200101071815.TAA24421@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin Str|mberg on Sun, 7 Jan 2001 19:15:59 +0100 (MET)) Subject: Re: df <-> df r:/ References: <200101071815 DOT TAA24421 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: Martin Str|mberg > Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 19:15:59 +0100 (MET) > > Yes, it was a video disc. However, there are no differences between > video and data discs on DVD. The only requirement is that a video DVD > must contain the directory /video_ts which contains the data for the > movie(s). Does it mean that you can do a "DIR /S" on a video DVD and see all the tracks as files and/or directories? Can you also copy the tracks with XCOPY and cp? > One could argue that a disc with that directory is a video DVD, but > that's an unnecessary limitation. It's a limitation, but if it is only relevant to non-data disks, perhaps it's not a grave limitation? How many people would want to use df to find the size of their video disks?