Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 13:25:58 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <4331-Sat06Jan2001132557+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200101051848.TAA15218@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on Fri, 5 Jan 2001 19:48:54 +0100 (MET))
Subject: Re: Making getdinfo changes prerequisite for locking fcntl changes
References:  <200101051848 DOT TAA15218 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 19:48:54 +0100 (MET)
> 
> According to Martin Str|mberg:
> > I've got the patch. If nobody objects I'll apply it after verifying
> > libc still compiles.
> 
> As this is just a reorganisation, it doesn't need a wc204.txi entry,
> right?

If there are no changes visible to applications, there's no need for
an entry in wc204.txi.