Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:02:15 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: New versions of perl require "flock" or working "fcntl(fh, F_SETLK/W,...)"
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001024092921.24828F-100000@is>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001024110138.24828P-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, I wrote:

> Btw, what about lockf?  It has similar functionality and might be even
> Posix (anybody knows?).

On closer look, lockf is not a Posix function.