X-Authentication-Warning: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de: broeker owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:02:16 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
X-Sender: broeker AT acp3bf
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc-2.97: Problems building libio for targets i[3456]86-pc-msdosdjgpp
In-Reply-To: <00101112452200.31210@hal>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010111259090.5452-100000@acp3bf>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> In current version of DJGPP type off_t is int and fpos_t is unsigned long. As 
> result libio/gen-params generates _G_config.h with 

Just a small question: does it really make any sense at all to build
libio, in the case of the DJGPP target? For libio to be useful, wouldn't
we have to modify our libc to use it, too?

Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.