Message-ID: <399A95F4.1A446F4F@softhome.net> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 15:24:04 +0200 From: Laurynas Biveinis X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: lt,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Patch: open() adjustment for symlinks References: <39998D7D DOT 70F85B9E AT softhome DOT net> <5137-Tue15Aug2000223737+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3999A16F DOT F8809412 AT softhome DOT net> <3099-Wed16Aug2000002312+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <399A6110 DOT CA193440 AT softhome DOT net> <7263-Wed16Aug2000150127+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <399A8760 DOT 7F5943F3 AT softhome DOT net> <1438-Wed16Aug2000155816+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:21:52 +0200 > > From: Laurynas Biveinis > > > > +Note that @code{__solve_symlinks} does not contain FSEXT handler, so > > +an extension cannot intercept symlink resolution directly. However, > > +@code{__solve_symlinks} eventually calls @code{_open} and @code{_read}, > > +so if you provide open and read handlers, your extension should work OK > > +with symlinks too. > > Two comments: If we are going to provide readlink() FSEXT hook, then this chapter goes to thrash bin anyway. Laurynas