From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id: <200008031140.NAA04514@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: New function: lstat()
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:40:20 +0200 (MET DST)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000803141234.12419B-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Aug 03, 2000 02:17:49 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Eli said:
> That's what they were: technical comments.  I don't think someone said 
> that symlink support should not be included.
> 
> DJ, do you recall something different?
> 
> At least my comments were merely meant to point out possible adverse 
> effects of this support.  But since no one was seriously bothered by 
> those potential problems, I don't see any obstacles to commit the 
> changes.  If you think they are ready to be commited, that is.
>
> I believe these aspects were already considered.  If someone has second 
> thoughts about that, please speak up.

The only two reason for me not applying the symlinks patches are:
1. Too much to for me right now.
2. Laurynas said he'd be doing that.

So Laurynas, go for it!


Right,

						MartinS