Message-Id: <200007290638.JAA27818@mailgw3.netvision.net.il>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 09:37:58 +0200
To: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, bkorb AT sco DOT COM
In-reply-to: <200007281738.NAA09572@envy.delorie.com> (message from DJ Delorie
	on Fri, 28 Jul 2000 13:38:53 -0400)
Subject: Re: DJGPP patch for fixincludes
References: <397DCC3F DOT 32D9BB7C AT sco DOT com> <200007281731 DOT UAA10498 AT mailgw1 DOT netvision DOT net DOT il> <200007281738 DOT NAA09572 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 13:38:53 -0400
> From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
> 
> Does it fix the NULL problem?  It would be cool if we didn't need to
> re-release djdev just for gcc.

No, it didn't fix anything: the directory where it puts fixed headers
was empty after it ran, meaning that it thought all of our headers
were okay (of course, we already know that ;-).  While the program
runs, it does try to fix several headers, but as the fixes aren't
relevant to our headers, the fixed versions are identical to the
original ones, and the program deletes them after comparing them.

Bruce, was fixincl supposed to fix NULL?  I don't think so, but
perhaps I overlooked some test.

We could always add a fix if we want to, though.