Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 18:37:58 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GCC headers
In-Reply-To: <3976E019.32763.16018F@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000720183326.28054A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Mark E. wrote:

> > Coulds someone please post the contents of limits.h that GCC wants to 
> > install?  (If I can get GCC's limits.h by anon CVS, just tell me how,
> > so I could stop bothering you-all.)  Thanks in advance.
> 
> Here it is:

Thanks.

I'm sorry for asking more questions, but I don't want to make a fool out 
of ourselves when I reply to Martin Loewis.

> #ifndef _GCC_LIMITS_H_  /* Terminated in limity.h.  */
> #define _GCC_LIMITS_H_
[...]
> #else /* not _GCC_LIMITS_H_ */
> 
> #ifdef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H
>  #include_next <limits.h>		/* recurse down to the real one */
> #endif

This seems to be a provision for using our limits.h instead of the one 
GCC supplies.  But I don't understand how are _GCC_LIMITS_H_ and 
_GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H supposed to be defined.  Do they come from specs?

Also, is this include_next gork present in the other headers GCC wants
to install?