From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id: <200007151317.PAA26867@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: DJGPP problem executing a script
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 15:17:40 +0200 (MET DST)
In-Reply-To: <39703247.B33FE01D@softhome.net> from "Laurynas Biveinis" at Jul 15, 2000 11:43:35 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> 
> "Mark E." wrote:
> > 
> > > Seems okay to me.  Thanks!
> > 
> > BTW, you or someone else will have to install it. I'm not a "maintainer" even
> > though I generate patches against CVS.
> 
> Perhaps we could agree who should install patches from folks who can't do that
> themselves? IMHO having a person (e.g. me) who could be constantly pestered about 
> "This patch was submitted and approved few weeks ago, but not installed, why?" 
> would speed up things. I could be that person.
> 
> Laurynas
> 

Nice idea, but it won't work. What happens if your away for some time?

However, as everybody is overworked with other things to do, it would
be very good of you, if you're not away, to try to commit things from
non-cvs persons if the patch is considered good.

So I think it's ok. Go ahead. Thanks!


Right,

							MartinS