Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <395F0F5B.713FBC28@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2000 10:46:03 +0100
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Confusing portability statements in libc reference?
References: <395DB7FA DOT 56B0ABB3 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <200007011223 DOT PAA02128 AT mailgw1 DOT netvision DOT net DOT il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> (DJ uses texi2html to produce the on-line version of the docs accessible
> from www.delorie.com/djgpp/docs/).

Presumably texinfo 4.0's HTML isn't used because a) it's effort to switch,
b) it doesn't support splitting up the HTML output into multiple files =>
slow, unnavigable, etc.?

> I think texi2html does support @multitable now, so this could be
> changed for the next version of DJGPP.  Any takers?

[Grins] Part of asking the question was a desire to fix this. So, yes,
I'll produce a patch at some point.

Bye, Rich =]