Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:16:03 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Patch: new GCC builtins for stdarg.h/varargs.h
In-Reply-To: <39525DBB.905C4611@softhome.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000623081538.4583B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> I wrote:
> > 
> > Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Yes.  But this is even better:
> > >
> > >   @findex va_list AT r{, implemented with GCC built-ins}
> > 
> > So is the following OK to install?
> 
> Can anyone explicitly approve that patch, or is it OK because
> it was here for some time and nobody has spoken up?

I gather you can check it in, since no one objected to it.