From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200005111819.UAA03303@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: Idea: Cutting edge DJGPP (alpha DJGPP?)
In-Reply-To: <200005111516.LAA23881@envy.delorie.com> from DJ Delorie at "May 11, 2000 11:16:04 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 20:19:13 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to DJ Delorie:
> 
> > > If we can come to some consensus about who should be
> > > allowed to check things in (history, reliability, quality, etc), I'm
> > > willing to add some more people to that list to spread the work
> > > around.
> > 
> > Yes, please!
> 
> OK, then.  Note to all: if you are interested in working in djgpp's
> core, and can do remote CVS, and are willing and able to take
> responsibility for your patches, and think that the DJGPP community
> will trust you to Do The Right Thing, now's the time to speak up!

Define "can do remote CVS".


Right,

							MartinS