Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 11:00:33 +0200 (IST) From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz AT is To: Martin Str|mberg cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: restrict In-Reply-To: <200004021758.TAA26704@father.ludd.luth.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Martin Str|mberg wrote: > According to Eli Zaretskii: > > However, I'm not even sure it's a good idea to have those `restrict' > > keywords in the headers, or to compile the library with them being > > visible to the compiler: it might introduce bugs or unexpected > > misfeatures into user programs. All we gain in return is some code > > efficiency. Comments? > > Can we leave them out and still be standard compliant? I don't know. Does the standard actually *require* the prototypes to include `restrict'?