Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:19:27 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
cc: DJGPP-WORKERS <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Unnormals???
In-Reply-To: <200003201649.RAA27339@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000320191858.27773C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Martin Stromberg wrote:

> Perhaps the n-char-sequence shall be used to show the bitpattern of
> the NaN? Then we would see the sign if we knew what bit it is...

This is also a possibility I won't object.