Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:14:50 +0200 (IST) From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz AT is To: Martin Str|mberg cc: DJGPP-WORKERS Subject: Re: The test directory (djtst203.zip) In-Reply-To: <200001102025.VAA05824@father.ludd.luth.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 10 Jan 100, Martin Str|mberg wrote: > How is it supposed to work? Should "make" result in the tests being > run? Yes. But djtst was not yet revved up to be as automatic as djlsr. In particular, it probably doesn't work in the cross-build environment. There's another problem with djtst: the test programs usually don't tell you whether the results are okay or not. You need to examine the results and decide that by yorself. Sometimes this decision requires a fairly good knowledge of library internals. If you feel like working on that, please do. > Anyway here's two files that I'm working on to make it make in one > go. Feedback and ideas are welcome. > > ----- Start of /djgpp/tests/libc/makefile. ----- > all : > -export CURDIR = `pwd` > find * -type d -exec bash ${CURDIR}/cd_make.sh '{}' ';' We usually try very hard to avoid using anything but stock djdev binaries (and Make). Thus, `find', Bash, and `pwd' are out. You can instead use the special programs (like makemake.exe, misc.exe, etc.) written specifically for building djlsr without any other GNU tools.