Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 18:14:55 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Bill Currie <billc AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz>
cc: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT mathematik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de>,
        DJGPP workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Latest stub
In-Reply-To: <339ECC5D.3315@blackmagic.tait.co.nz>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970612181306.9257S-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 11 Jun 1997, Bill Currie wrote:

> As to why IO is slower with a `64k' buffer, that's easy... 64k in 16
> bits is 0 which is less than the 2k minimum, and so the transfer buffer
> size winds up being 2k instead of 64k.

Yes, that's easy, now that I'm aware of that.  But try to explain this 
one: several people have reported (it's even in the FAQ) that stubediting 
ld.exe to 64KB makes linking *much* faster when the libraries are on a 
networked drive.