X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 22:13:45 +0300
Message-Id: <834ltpzst2.fsf@gnu.org>
From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <eueks1FadflU1@mid.dfncis.de> (message from Hans-Bernhard
 =?utf-8?Q?Br=C3=B6ker?=
	on Wed, 2 Aug 2017 20:44:12 +0200)
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU binutils 2.29 uploaded.
References: <201707301540 DOT v6UFecLb017840 AT delorie DOT com>
 <CAA2C=vBWY7HYeu+tdO=WYN=wEmWfhLXWgH-9PtSvZkMs54rs1Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <5980C3AA DOT 2080305 AT gmx DOT de> <euccrcFp8kqU1 AT mid DOT dfncis DOT de>
 <598108FD DOT 5060908 AT gmx DOT de> <eueks1FadflU1 AT mid DOT dfncis DOT de>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker AT t-online DOT de>
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 20:44:12 +0200
> 
> Aha, so the conflict is not between libiberty and DJGPP libc, but rather 
> between libbfd and DJGPP libc.
> 
> That has the potential of changing the entire story, because these are, 
> to at least some degree, _both_ part of "the implementation", i.e. both 
> sides of the conflict have rather equally valid rights to use this kind 
> of name.

??? The BFD library is certainly not the "implementation".  Why did
you think it was?