X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=FDCZoi+dOixaPrgu3aMqVzQCZrC+q3dKIsS3apE11F4=;
        b=K0LJZtH6LJCsILzeZuD9jQaz8avtvLRTlj7+cCpZ4WmytGX7yEyst3d4zW0HbeQ0K5msioulmOrWEb+PD5aWVNdaw9znAbkFWf3Kch2IWTfArKcWDw+fjH3xK0RCzLUyMp/YDZr3uySRyrA5wyR9KH0AU+Qwq90P9YeW4F7Zxgo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=ag0+U49HnYd4WFaB7EImDgq7wWwiREaJEBFejxtKnGwEeFedFhJpGtKbsx891khDY6IO6vAGV2l8TX9Bx43Ka8ow+5F9hlPNFBmHv++5WOrWIOCInFWtP94xg60bQdG6v7pAWaphARc4mqfHf+uYNItVerfpo2+ikAaFbR6JS5s=
Message-ID: <2497d9a20803161347j3c75d607o7c4ba96f19ccf965@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:47:06 -0400
From: "Matthew Petricone" <strstream AT gmail DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: timing problems using uclock()
In-Reply-To: <ba8a5ae6-3fd2-4427-9720-8f81f90b5ff4@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <532aac2f-c863-49f4-8d4b-43b22350f9d8 AT e23g2000prf DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	 <ba8a5ae6-3fd2-4427-9720-8f81f90b5ff4 AT 2g2000hsn DOT googlegroups DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Haven't used djgpp in a while, but more information would help. For
starters, if your using allegro, there are problems using uclock.
The're in the Allegro docs.
Also check out
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/doc/libc/libc_834.html
make sure you're using the right type, a long long I think. It also
sais uclock works differently under winXP.'

> Does nobody have his problem using uclock(), or do u need more
> information?
>
> Sincerly,
> daniel kiedrowski
>
>
> On 13 Mrz., 16:15, Daniel Kiedrowski <k DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmx DOT de> wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > I am using uclock() under winxp to do my high resolution timing, but
> > its really does strange things:
> >
> > Sometimes a later call of uclock() returns a smaller value.
> >
> > I searched this newsgroup for other postings and find a lot posts, but
> > none of them gives me a solution. Posts that were reffered to,
> > covering this problem, arent existing anymore.
> >
> > Greetz
> > daniel kiedrowski
>
>