Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 15:55:52 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: second try: [PATCH] finishing spawn / vfork signal inheritance
Message-ID: <20030324205552.GA18464@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3E79FA1B DOT 60302 AT hekimian DOT com> <3E7F5A9C DOT 4050804 AT hekimian DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3E7F5A9C.4050804@hekimian.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 02:21:00PM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote:
>If someone with CVS access would commit this, I would appreciate it.
>Currently, spawn() and vfork() do not pass signal handler settings
>on to the child process, and this breaks ksh93.  This patch fixes
>the problem (in conjunction with a change cgf already committed).

There is little to be gained by waiting for less than a week and then
bugging me.

cgf