Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:36:11 -0500 (EST) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com To: "Pierre A. Humblet" cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: HEADSUP everyone: 32/64bit changes are commited In-Reply-To: <3E6CA23A.C439C1FC@ieee.org> Message-ID: Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > > Pierre, > > > > First off, there is a patch (in?) that allows sparse files on NT+, so it > > may not be that much of a deal on those systems (unless the indices are > > dense enough, which is not going to happen). Is the above likely to be a > > problem on Win9x? > > Good point. > On Win9x mkpasswd limits the uid to 64k, so not a real problem. > Are sparse files available on all NT versions and all file systems? I think NTFS only... :-( Maybe a hash could be used instead of an array? > > Secondly, is lastlog accessed through a uniform interface (library), or > > does every application implement its own? > > Apparently the latter. I couldn't find any standard. > Pierre Then it's a matter of changing each individual application... Nasty. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Oh, boy, virtual memory! Now I'm gonna make myself a really *big* RAMdisk! -- /usr/games/fortune