Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:19:46 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 1.3.21
Message-ID: <20030221171946.GB28961@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20030221153741 DOT GA26756 AT redhat DOT com> <3E565B02 DOT D5180EF1 AT ieee DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3E565B02.D5180EF1@ieee.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 11:59:46AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>> It looks like there have been enough bug fixes to possibly justify a new
>> release.  Have we solved the "man doesn't work because man pages are
>> mysteriously protected wrong" problem?
>
>It's should be back to the 1.3.19 situation. It can still be improved by a new
>setup, with my ntsec patch.
>
>> Is there anything wonderful waiting in the wings?
>
>Not from here, although there is something I'd like to do some day:
>add date/time in syslog output on Win95/98/ME.
>At the same time I'd like to print the pids in decimal format (all platforms),
>like ps. Is there a reason to keep the hex format?

No.

>Also is it really helpful to print both the Windows pid and the cygwin pid?

No.

Patch away!

cgf