Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 17:56:55 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: recent checkin
Message-ID: <20030210225654.GA15566@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

I just changed the argument to some of the ntsec functions to take a
mode_t* rather than a int*.  The reason for this is that I changed
mode_t to an unsigned value from a signed value and mode_t types were
being passed to these functions in some situations.  unsigned is more
consistent with linux and more in keeping with the way that the value is
used.

I am hoping that, since I didn't receive any warnings about unsigned
comparisons, everything is ok but I thought I'd better send out a
heads up to Corinna and Pierre anyway.

I also moved the control of the ufoo_t and foo_t typedefs to
include/cygwin/type.h and protected everything with ifndefs.

FYI,
cgf