Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:06:18 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Subauthentication Message-ID: <20021213140618.S7796@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20021213130733 DOT P7796 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 01:43:25PM +0100, Hartmut Honisch wrote: > The thing is that linking cygwin dll to the lsadll.lib will statically link > it to ntdll.dll, which isn't available on 9x, so the cygwin dll would not > work there. OUCH! That's a show-stopper. Well, sort of... > However, we could of course just not support subauth on NT. Then we _could_ > use the autoload stuff as it is now ... ...that sounds like the best approach to begin with. For gods sake we have create_token which works on NT4. The additional advantage of getting a fine logon session id would then require 2K or XP... which isn't too bad. If we require that stuff to work on NT4 from the beginning I fear we will get stuck in all the workaround and licensing hogwash. Other opinion anyone? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.