Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:56:13 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Many pthread failures in the test suite, one setgroup failure Message-ID: <20020925155613.GA2374@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020925141653 DOT GA6134 AT redhat DOT com> <20020925162508 DOT H20875 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <83368880832 DOT 20020925183143 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20020925164219 DOT I20875 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20020925145002 DOT GA1439 AT redhat DOT com> <20020925170150 DOT L20875 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020925170150.L20875@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 05:01:50PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:50:02AM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote: >> OTOH, I noticed a new XPASS in this run. I don't know if this is an >> anomoly or not. > >You mean, you're running that test w/o privs and it PASSes? > >Wait... [dig, dig, dig] oh, sure. That's ok. Setgroups() just >memorizes the new group list for the next setuid(). So it doesn't >fail if the list of groups is ok regardless of the privileges of >the user. Nevermind. I actually don't know what's passing. I just noticed an XPASS. Haven't investigated yet. cgf