Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <015801c260eb$095ebd20$6132bc3e@BABEL> From: "Conrad Scott" To: "Nicholas Wourms" Cc: References: <00dd01c260e3$7dc35070$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <20020920203029 DOT GA29020 AT redhat DOT com> <010701c260e7$b7be0230$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <3D8B8D79 DOT 3090109 AT netscape DOT net> Subject: Re: Issue with cygwin_daemon merge Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:16:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 "Nicholas Wourms" wrote: > Wouldn't it just be easier to use "-x foo.h -x foe.h -x > fum.h" type arguments with cvs diff to generate a patch > without these headers? Then you could adjust the includes > in the source file(s) in a seperate checkin. I assume you're referring to the original issue of how to merge the branch into the HEAD? But for that, there are changes to these very headers too that I need to merge; and I'd also prefer to do the merge as a single commit rather than in stages (this avoids leaving the repository half-broken and also might make the history rather clearer for those who follow on afterwards). Cheers, // Conrad